Public Schools as Good as Private Ones
On Student Achievement: Study
Printer Friendly Version:
Students
in public schools learn as much or more mathematics between kindergarten and fifth
grade as similar students learn in private schools, according to a new
University of Illinois study of multiyear, longitudinal data on nearly 10,000
students.
The
results of the study appeared in the May issue of a major education journal, Phi
Delta Kappan.
“These
data provide strong, longitudinal evidence that public schools are at least as
effective as private schools in boosting student achievement,” according to the
authors, education professor Christopher Lubienski,
doctoral student Corinna Crane and education
professor Sarah Theule Lubienski.
The
new report is the first published study to show that public schools are at
least as effective as private schools at promoting student learning over time,
the authors say.
Combined
with other, yet-unpublished studies of the same data, which produced similar
findings, “We think this effectively ends the debate about whether private
schools are more effective than publics,” said Christopher Lubienski,
whose research has dealt with all aspects of alternative education.
This
is important, he said, because many current reforms, such as No Child Left
Behind, charter schools and vouchers for private schools, are at least
partially based on that assumption.
The
debate essentially began three years ago with the publication in Phi Delta Kappan of a previous study by the Lubienskis,
which challenged the then-common wisdom - supported by well-regarded but dated
research - that private schools were superior to public schools.
In
that 2005 study, the Lubienskis found that public
school students tested higher in math than their private school peers from
similar social and economic backgrounds.
In another, more-extensive study in early 2006, they built on those
findings, and also raised similar questions about charter schools. Both studies were based on fourth- and
eighth-grade test data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP).
The
conclusions were supported later in 2006 with similar findings from U.S.
Department of Education studies comparing public schools with private schools,
and with charters. The federal studies looked mainly at NAEP test data on both
math and reading.
Critics
of the previous studies, however, cited the lack of longitudinal data showing
the possible effect over time of different kinds of schooling. The new study was designed, in part, to
address that issue, the authors say in their PDK article.
The
PDK article is available online for a fee of $7.00 at
http://tinyurl.com/Lubienski.
Editor’s
Note: This article was written by staff at the Illinois Association of School
Boards and was reprinted with permission.