CODE F11
POLICY: STUDENT CLUBS & ACTIVITIES
(SECONDARY)
Policy
The school will maintain a student activity
program appropriate to the maturity of students and as varied as staff and
facilities permit. The program will be designed to offer for the greatest
number of students worthwhile leisure time interests, wholesome recreational
and social activity, and opportunities to develop skills in democratic and
cooperative management for these activities.
Clubs
and activities may be (1) school-sponsored and related to the curriculum, (2)
student-run and not related to the curriculum, or (3) community-sponsored and
not related to the curriculum. This
policy addresses the first two categories.
The third is addressed in the school district policy on Community Use of
School Facilities[1]
I.
School-Sponsored Curriculum-Related Groups
A. Curriculum-related
groups are the only type entitled to school sponsorship. The controlling factor
in deciding whether an activity will be sponsored by the school will be whether that activity is directly related to the
school's curriculum. No activity that is not directly related to the curriculum
or educational mission of the school will receive sponsorship, regardless of
whether it meets the other criteria for sponsorship.
B. Activities
or clubs which meet at least one of the following criteria will be considered
curriculum-related.
1. The subject matter of the student group or club is
actually taught or will be taught in a regularly scheduled course.
2. The subject matter of the group or club is such that
it concerns the body of courses as a whole.
3. Participation in the group is required for a
particular course.
4. Participation in the group results in academic
credit.
C. The
Principal [or Superintendent] will approve new requests for activity sponsorship
based on the following considerations.
1. The potential of the activity to help participating
students meet the goals of the school's curriculum.
2. The level of student interest in the activity;
3. The fiscal ramifications of sponsorship;
4. The availability of qualified personnel to supervise
the activity; and
5. The impact of adding or
eliminating the activity on the balance of types of activities available in the
total activity program.
D. All
school-sponsored activities will be under the ultimate control of the School
District and will comply with all policies and procedures of the school. The Principal [or Superintendent] may set
standards for academic eligibility for participation in these activities.
II. Student-Run
Noncurriculum-Related Groups[2]
A. A
student-run noncurriculum-related group, or “student
group” is one that is created by students, run by students, and provides
activities for students. If a group or
club is organized or run by adults, even if students attend its meetings, then
it is a community-sponsored group and must comply with Policy H3.
B. Student
groups, clubs or activities may use school facilities and have access to such
things as the public address system, bulletin boards, and publications[3]
provided that an equal opportunity is given to all student groups. If the District opens its facilities to any
student group, then it must provide the same opportunities to all other student
groups.[4]
A fair opportunity will be provided to non-sponsored student groups wishing to
conduct meetings on school premises during non-instructional time provided
that:
1. any such meeting is voluntary and student initiated;
2. there is no sponsorship of the meeting by the school, the
government, or its agents or employees;
3. employees or agents of the school or any governmental entity
are present at religious meetings only in non-participatory capacities;
4. the meeting does not materially and substantially
interfere with the orderly conduct of educational activities within the school;
and
5. non-school persons do not direct, conduct, control or
regularly attend activities of student groups.[5]
C. Listings
and notices referring to non-sponsored clubs or activities will include a
disclaimer of school sponsorship or endorsement. District faculty and staff may
only be present at activities of student groups as monitors for keeping order.
D. The
Superintendent [or Principal] may do the following with respect to student
groups, as long as the same rules are applied to all student groups:
1. adopt rules to prohibit lewd and obscene speech
2. prohibit student groups from using school facilities if they
are likely to cause material or substantial disruption of school operations
3. impose time, place, and manner restrictions, and
4. require parental permission for student participation.
|
Date Warned:
|
|
|
Date Adopted:
|
|
|
Legal Reference(s):
|
20 U.S.C. §§4071 et seq. (Federal Equal Access Act)
Prince v. Jacoby, 303 F.3d 1074 (9th
Cir.), cert. denied 540 U.S. 813 (2002)
Rosenberger v. University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 810 (1995),
Board of Education of Westside Community Sch. v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 (1990).
Sease v. School District of Philadelphia, 81 F. Supp. 183 (E.D. Pa. 1993)
|
|
Cross Reference:
|
Community Use of School Facilities (H3)
|
|
|
Admission of Resident Students (F13)
|
|
|
Admission of Non-Resident Tuition Students (F14)
|
|
|
Participation of Home Study Students in School Programs
and Activities (F23)
|
[1] See VSBA Model
Policy H3 Community Use of School Facilities
[2] This section is governed by the Equal Access Act, 20 U.S.C. 4071 et
seq. It states, in part, that:
It shall be unlawful for any public secondary school which
receives Federal financial assistance and which has a limited open forum to
deny equal access or a fair opportunity to, or discriminate against, any
students who wish to conduct a meeting within that limited open forum on the
basis of the religious, political, philosophical, or other content of the
speech at such meetings.
[3] Prince v. Jacoby, 303 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir.), cert. denied
540 U.S. 813 (2002), held that since yearbook was paid for by student body
funds and not by public funds, the school could not charge a religious student
group for inclusion in the yearbook when other groups were included without
charge. Rosenberger v. University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 810 (1995), held
that university could not limit funds to student group due to its religious
viewpoint where group ran newspaper with Christian view on news while other
newspapers were funded. Funds were from
mandatory student activity fee and not from public funds.
[4] Even allowing only one
noncurriculum student group to meet in school facilities is enough to create a
limited open forum and trigger the application of the Equal Access Act. Board of Education of Westside Community Sch. v. Mergens, 496 U.S.
226 (1990).
[5] Equal Access Act, 20 U.S.C. 4071; Sease
v. School District of Philadelphia, 81 F. Supp. 183 (E.D. Pa. 1993) (school
secretary who led gospel choir violated provisions of law even though choir was
outside her regular duties in district).